wiki.techinc.nl/composer.json

182 lines
6.2 KiB
JSON
Raw Normal View History

Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
{
"name": "mediawiki/core",
"description": "Free software wiki application developed by the Wikimedia Foundation and others",
"type": "mediawiki-core",
"keywords": [
"mediawiki",
"wiki"
],
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
"homepage": "https://www.mediawiki.org/",
"authors": [
{
"name": "MediaWiki Community",
"homepage": "https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:Version/Credits"
}
],
"license": "GPL-2.0-or-later",
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
"support": {
"issues": "https://bugs.mediawiki.org/",
"irc": "irc://irc.libera.chat/mediawiki",
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
"wiki": "https://www.mediawiki.org/"
},
"prefer-stable": true,
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
"require": {
"composer/semver": "3.3.2",
"cssjanus/cssjanus": "2.1.0",
"ext-calendar": "*",
"ext-ctype": "*",
"ext-dom": "*",
"ext-fileinfo": "*",
"ext-iconv": "*",
"ext-intl": "*",
"ext-json": "*",
"ext-libxml": "*",
"ext-mbstring": "*",
"ext-xml": "*",
"ext-xmlreader": "*",
"guzzlehttp/guzzle": "7.4.5",
"justinrainbow/json-schema": "5.2.11",
"liuggio/statsd-php-client": "1.0.18",
"monolog/monolog": "2.2.0",
"oojs/oojs-ui": "0.44.0",
"pear/mail": "1.4.1",
"pear/mail_mime": "1.10.11",
"pear/net_smtp": "1.10.0",
"php": "~7.2.22 || >=7.3.8",
"psr/container": "1.1.1",
"psr/log": "1.1.4",
WebRequest & RequestFromGlobals: get HTTP headers in one way apache_request_headers() is a vendor-specific function - it got used when present and alternative code paths were exercised otherwise. These preserved certain "special" headers, e.g. Content-Type, only inconsistently. The function getallheaders() is an alias[1] for apache_request_headers() on systems where the latter is present. Alternatively, there is a polyfill (ralouphie/getallheaders) which is already installed in mediawiki-vendor[2] (by virtue of guzzle). Using getallheaders() exclusively, will make sure these "special" headers are consistently available alongside their "regular"[3] peers and helps MediaWiki code focus on its domain. The dependency to ralouphie/getallheaders is made explicit in the same version in which it is currently locked in mediawiki-vendor[4]. This surfaced because the deprecation warning for API POST requests without a Content-Type header, introduced in bba1a0f, appeared in my development system (somewhat dated addshore/mediawiki-docker-dev/) even though the client did a fine job. Interesting implementation detail: While WebRequest keeps track of headers using keys in all upper case, REST RequestFromGlobals does so in all lower case - but both use retrieval logic complementary to their respective approach however. In case of REST RequestFromGlobals this is encapsulated inside of HeaderContainer (setting and retrieving), while WebRequest does all of this by itself. Cf. [5] and [6] [1]: https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.getallheaders.php [2]: https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-vendor/tree/8f2967d/ralouphie/getallheaders [3]: https://www.php.net/manual/en/reserved.variables.server.php#110763 [4]: https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-vendor/blob/8f2967d/composer.lock#L3250 [5]: https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec4.html#sec4.2 [6]: https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.apache-request-headers.php#124236 Bug: T245535 Change-Id: Iba52f152e15928473b729a2588c2462e76e85634
2020-03-18 08:49:15 +00:00
"ralouphie/getallheaders": "3.0.3",
"symfony/polyfill-php73": "1.26.0",
"symfony/polyfill-php80": "1.26.0",
"symfony/yaml": "5.4.10",
"wikimedia/assert": "0.5.1",
"wikimedia/at-ease": "2.1.0",
"wikimedia/base-convert": "2.0.2",
"wikimedia/cdb": "2.0.0",
"wikimedia/cldr-plural-rule-parser": "2.0.0",
"wikimedia/common-passwords": "0.4.0",
"wikimedia/composer-merge-plugin": "2.0.1",
"wikimedia/html-formatter": "3.0.1",
"wikimedia/ip-set": "3.1.0",
"wikimedia/ip-utils": "4.0.0",
"wikimedia/less.php": "3.1.0",
"wikimedia/minify": "2.3.0",
"wikimedia/normalized-exception": "1.0.1",
"wikimedia/object-factory": "4.0.0",
"wikimedia/parsoid": "^0.16.0-a1@alpha",
"wikimedia/php-session-serializer": "2.0.1",
"wikimedia/purtle": "1.0.8",
"wikimedia/relpath": "3.0.0",
"wikimedia/remex-html": "3.0.2",
"wikimedia/request-timeout": "1.2.0",
"wikimedia/running-stat": "2.0.0",
"wikimedia/scoped-callback": "3.0.0",
"wikimedia/services": "2.0.1",
"wikimedia/shellbox": "3.0.0",
"wikimedia/utfnormal": "3.0.2",
"wikimedia/timestamp": "4.0.0",
"wikimedia/wait-condition-loop": "2.0.2",
"wikimedia/wrappedstring": "4.0.1",
"wikimedia/xmp-reader": "0.8.3",
"zordius/lightncandy": "1.2.6"
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
},
"require-dev": {
"ext-simplexml": "*",
"composer/spdx-licenses": "1.5.6",
"doctrine/dbal": "2.13.6||3.1.5",
"doctrine/sql-formatter": "1.1.1",
"giorgiosironi/eris": "^0.10.0",
"hamcrest/hamcrest-php": "^2.0",
"johnkary/phpunit-speedtrap": "^4.0",
"mediawiki/mediawiki-codesniffer": "38.0.0",
"mediawiki/mediawiki-phan-config": "0.11.1",
"nikic/php-parser": "^4.10.2",
"php-parallel-lint/php-console-highlighter": "0.5",
"php-parallel-lint/php-parallel-lint": "1.3.1",
"phpunit/phpunit": "^8.5",
"psy/psysh": "^0.11.1",
"seld/jsonlint": "1.8.3",
"wikimedia/alea": "^0.9.3",
"wikimedia/testing-access-wrapper": "~2.0",
"wmde/hamcrest-html-matchers": "^1.0.0"
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
},
"replace": {
"symfony/polyfill-ctype": "1.99",
"symfony/polyfill-mbstring": "1.99"
},
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
"suggest": {
"ext-apcu": "Faster web responses overall.",
"ext-curl": "Faster HTTP services, e.g. when using InstantCommons, Swift, or Etcd.",
"ext-gd": "Enable thumbnails for file uploads.",
"ext-mysqli": "Enable the MySQL and MariaDB database type for MediaWiki.",
"ext-openssl": "Encrypt session data (or opt-out via $wgSessionInsecureSecrets).",
"ext-pdo": "Enable the SQLite database type for MediaWiki.",
"ext-pgsql": "Enable the PostgreSQL database type for MediaWiki.",
"ext-posix": "Enable CLI concurrent processing, e.g. for runJobs.php.",
"ext-pcntl": "Enable CLI concurrent processing, e.g. for runJobs.php and rebuildLocalisationCache.php.",
"ext-readline": "Enable CLI history and autocomplete, e.g. for eval.php and other REPLs.",
"ext-sockets": "Enable CLI concurrent processing, e.g. for rebuildLocalisationCache.php.",
"ext-wikidiff2": "Faster text difference engine.",
"ext-zlib": "Enable use of GZIP compression, e.g. for SqlBagOStuff (ParserCache), $wgCompressRevisions, or $wgUseFileCache.",
"monolog/monolog": "Enable use of MonologSpi ($wgMWLoggerDefaultSpi)."
},
"autoload": {
"psr-0": {
"ComposerHookHandler": "includes/composer",
"ComposerVendorHtaccessCreator": "includes/composer",
"ComposerPhpunitXmlCoverageEdit": "includes/composer"
}
},
"autoload-dev": {
"files": [
"vendor/hamcrest/hamcrest-php/hamcrest/Hamcrest.php",
"vendor/wmde/hamcrest-html-matchers/src/functions.php"
]
},
"scripts": {
"mw-install:sqlite": "php maintenance/install.php --server=http://localhost:4000 --dbtype sqlite --dbpath cache/ --scriptpath '' --pass adminpassword MediaWiki Admin",
"serve": "php -S localhost:4000",
"lint": "parallel-lint --exclude node_modules --exclude vendor",
"phan": "phan -d . --long-progress-bar",
"phpcs": "phpcs -p -s --cache",
"fix": [
"phpcbf"
],
"pre-install-cmd": "ComposerHookHandler::onPreInstall",
"pre-update-cmd": "ComposerHookHandler::onPreUpdate",
"post-install-cmd": "ComposerVendorHtaccessCreator::onEvent",
"post-update-cmd": "ComposerVendorHtaccessCreator::onEvent",
"releasenotes": "@phpunit:entrypoint --group ReleaseNotes",
"test": [
"@lint .",
"@phpcs ."
Define unit and integration test suites Following discussion in Ibb8175981092d7f41864e641cc3c118af70a5c76, this patch proposes to further reduce the scope of what unit tests may access, by removing the loading of DefaultSettings and GlobalFunctions.php. This also has the implied effect of disabling the storage backend, as well as the global service locator. MediaWikiTestCase is renamed to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase so it's scope and purpose is more clear. Whether we still need to keep `@group Database` annotation around is debatable, as it's unclear to me what the performance costs are of implying database access for all tests which extend IntegrationTestCase. As far as I can tell, `@group Database` is primarily used in CI to run faster tests before slower ones, and with the new UnitTestCase the annotation seems redundant. To run all testsuites, use `composer phpunit`. Other composer scripts: - `composer phpunit:unit` to run unit tests - `composer phpunit:integration` to run integration tests - `composer phpunit:coverage` to generate code coverage reports from unit tests (requires XDebug). Note that you can pass arguments to composer scripts with `--`, e.g. `composer phpunit:integration --exclude-group Dump`. Other changes: - Rename bootstrap.php to bootstrap.maintenance.php so it's clear it's part of the legacy PHPUnit-as-maintenance-class setup - Create new bootstrap.php which loads the minimal configuration necessary for the tests, and do additional setup in the run() method of the unit/integration test case classes - Move the unit-tests.xml file to phpunit.xml.dist in preparation for this being the default test configuration For a follow-up patch: - Find unit/integration tests for extensions/skins - Migrate other test suites from suite.xml - Support running all tests via vendor/bin/phpunit Bug: T84948 Bug: T89432 Bug: T87781 Change-Id: Ie717b0ecf4fcfd089d46248f14853c80b7ef4a76
2019-06-26 02:33:14 +00:00
],
"test-some": [
"@lint",
"@phpcs"
],
"phpunit": "php tests/phpunit/phpunit.php",
"phpunit:unit": "phpunit --colors=always --testsuite=core:unit,extensions:unit,skins:unit",
"phpunit:integration": "@phpunit --colors=always --testsuite=core:integration,extensions:integration,skins:integration",
"phpunit:coverage": "@phpunit --testsuite=core:unit --exclude-group Dump,Broken",
"phpunit:coverage-edit": "ComposerPhpunitXmlCoverageEdit::onEvent",
"phpunit:entrypoint": "@phpunit -c tests/phpunit/suite.xml"
},
"config": {
"optimize-autoloader": true,
"prepend-autoloader": false,
"allow-plugins": {
"composer/package-versions-deprecated": true,
"wikimedia/composer-merge-plugin": true
}
},
"extra": {
"merge-plugin": {
"include": [
"composer.local.json"
],
"merge-dev": false
}
Revert "Make it possible to install extensions using Composer" This reverts commit d6e69d774. MediaWiki extensions are by definition part of the MediaWiki software ecosystem, and could therefore be managed using a specialized solution; The same is not true of PHP packages at large: we're not in a position to change how the PHP community at large manages dependencies. To the extent that we have a choice, we should use interfaces like composer.json to solve for the problem of integration with the outside world. Change Ib125bea00 made the opposite choice, compromising our ability to express how MediaWiki relates to external software components in exchange for superficial gains in convenience of managing MediaWiki extensions. (I consider the gains superficial because they do not leverage the fact that extensions share MediaWiki's code -- a property that should be exploited to provide an extension management solution that is MediaWiki-aware, providing, for example, a uniform configuration management interface.) The cost of that change are manifest in bug 64597: we lost the ability to express a dependency on PHPUnit in the way that the PHPUnit upstream recommends. The problem that change Ib125bea00 set out to solve is that modifying composer.json to express dependencies on extensions means having a local diff that conflicts with the code in version control. This issue is actually discussed by the Composer documentation. In short, Composer's developers recommend that if your production environment uses a cvs to version code, you should maintain your own clone of the upstream repository and version your composer.json that way. More detailed discussion of these issues can be found at <https://getcomposer.org/doc/05-repositories.md#vcs> and <https://getcomposer.org/doc/faqs/why-can't-composer-load-repositories-recursively.md>. I also note that the Composer documentation makes many references to monolog as an exemplary Composer project, and it too maintains a composer.json in the repository root. Change-Id: I3e7c668ee32401e731120cfa9f96986fd8fde8f4
2014-05-11 10:00:35 +00:00
}
}