Why:
* Maintenance scripts in core have bolierplate code that is
added before and after the class to allow directly running
the maintenance script.
* Running the maintenance script directly has been deprecated
since 1.40, so this boilerplate code is only to support a now
deprecated method of running maintenance scripts.
* This code cannot also be marked as covered, due to PHPUnit
not recognising code coverage for files.
* Therefore, it is best to ignore this boilerplate code in code
coverage reports as it cannot be marked as covered and also
is for deprecated code.
What:
* Wrap the boilerplate code (requiring Maintenance.php and then
later defining the maintenance script class and running if the
maintenance script was called directly) with @codeCoverageIgnore
comments.
* Some files use a different boilerplate code, however, these
should also be marked as ignored for coverage for the same
reason that coverage is not properly reported for files.
Bug: T371167
Change-Id: I32f5c6362dfb354149a48ce9c28da9a7fc494f7c
Maintenance class provides a method for getting a fresh reference
of the MW services container instance. Let's make use of these in
maintenance scripts now that we have it.
NOTE: There are still some static methods like in refreshLinks.php
that makes use of services that we can't use this method for now.
Change-Id: Idba744057577896fc97c9ecf4724db27542bf01c
Deprecate the second argument to Maintenance::error() in favor of a new
Maintenance::fatalError() method. This is intended to make it easier to
review flow control in maintenance scripts.
Change-Id: I75699008638f7e99b11210c7bb9e2e131fca7c9e
Follows-up I1343872de7, Ia533aedf63 and I2df2f80b81.
Also updated usage in text in documentation and the
installer LocalSettingsGenerator.
Most of them were handled by this regex:
- find: (require|include|require_once|include_once)\s*\(\s*(.+?)\s*\)\s*;$
- replace: $1 $2;
Change-Id: I6b38aad9a5149c9c43ce18bd8edbab14b8ce43fa
Squiz.WhiteSpace.LanguageConstructSpacing:
Language constructs must be followed by a single space;
expected "require_once expression" but found
"require_once(expression)"
It is a keyword (e.g. like `new`, `return` and `print`). As
such the parentheses don't make sense.
Per our code conventions, we use a space after keywords like
these. We appeared to have an unwritten exception for `require`
that doesn't make sense. About 60% of require/include usage
was missing the space and/or had superfluous parentheses.
It is as silly as print("foo") or return("foo"), it works
because keywords have no significance for whitespace between
it and the expression that follows, and since experessions can
be wrapped in parentheses for clarity (e.g. when doing string
concatenation or mathematical operations) the parenthesis
before and after basiclaly just ignored.
Change-Id: I2df2f80b8123714bea7e0771bf94b51ad5bb4b87
