It is not entirely meaningless. It might be an indicator that
the number of calls to a method is intentionally unlimited.
This is similar to e.g. an @inheritDoc PHPDoc comment that
marks a method as being "intentionally undocumented".
However, what's the meaning of being "intentionally
unconstrained"? Let's just not have any constraint then.
I feel all these ->expects( $this->any() ) bloat the test
code so much that it's never worth it.
Change-Id: I9925e7706bd03e1666f6eb0b284cb42b0dd3be23
It's the same and makes the test code much more readable, I
would like to argue.
Because of the was I split all the changes I made into smaller
patches this patch contains some other changes in the same
lines where I could not split them off. E.g. removal of
->any(), which is the default anyway and doesn't do anything.
Change-Id: Ib297b989d4aec33b31a4e33fe9d5032865b39be0
Ended up using
grep -Prl '\->setMethods\(' . | xargs sed -r -i 's/setMethods\(/onlyMethods\(/g'
special-casing setMethods( null ) -> onlyMethods( [] )
and then manual fix of failing test (from PS2 onwards).
Bug: T278010
Change-Id: I012dca7ae774bb430c1c44d50991ba0b633353f1
Using a random id as the cache key is useful in that it ensures
we don't poison ourselves with results from unrelated closures,
but it also prevents any use of APCu caching beyond the current
web request which is kind of what it is for.
There is a subclass inside the test case that stores results
in-process with an array instead, but for things like that we
generally use in-object caching of class instances, or
HashBagOStuff::getWithSet, or MapCacheLRU::getWithSet.
Change-Id: I264ad87af25dda4cde0c71aad83b30c314f8cd8d
Done with `composer fix` and suppressing the rest (i.e. sniffs for
global variables, which for core should be suppressed anyway).
Additionally, add `-p` to `phpcbf`, as otherwise it just seems stuck.
Change-Id: Ide8d6cdd083655891b6d654e78440fbda81ab2bc
This should be the exact same. Its more a style change than anything.
So why do it then?
* I believe this is much less confusing than code mentioning a weird
"standard class". Barely anybody knows what this is, and what the
difference between "object" and "stdClass" is.
* The code is shorter.
* It's even faster. In my micro benchmark it's twice as fast.
Change-Id: I7ee0e8ae6d9264a89b6cd1dd861f0466ae620ccc
This changeset implements T89432 and related tickets and is based on exploration
done at the Prague Hackathon. The goal is to identify tests in MediaWiki core
that can be run without having to install & configure MediaWiki and its dependencies,
and provide a way to execute these tests via the standard phpunit entry point,
allowing for faster development and integration with existing tooling like IDEs.
The initial set of tests that met these criteria were identified using the work Amir did in
I88822667693d9e00ac3d4639c87bc24e5083e5e8. These tests were then moved into a new subdirectory
under phpunit/ and organized into a separate test suite. The environment for this suite
is set up via a PHPUnit bootstrap file without a custom entry point.
You can execute these tests by running:
$ vendor/bin/phpunit -d memory_limit=512M -c tests/phpunit/unit-tests.xml
Bug: T89432
Bug: T87781
Bug: T84948
Change-Id: Iad01033a0548afd4d2a6f2c1ef6fcc9debf72c0d
2019-06-13 22:56:31 +02:00
Renamed from tests/phpunit/includes/libs/MemoizedCallableTest.php (Browse further)
