Follows-up I361fde0de7f4406bce6ed075ed397effa5be3359.
Per T253461, not mass-changing source code, but the use of the native
error silencing operator (@) is especially useful in tests because:
1. It requires any/all statements to be explicitly marked. The
suppressWarnings/restoreWarnings sections encourage developers to
be "lazy" and thus encapsulate more than needed if there are multiple
ones near each other, which would ignore potentially important
warnings in a test case, which is generally exactly the time when
it is really useful to get warnings etc.
2. It avoids leaking state, for example in LBFactoryTest the
assertFalse call would throw a PHPUnit assertion error (not meant
to be caught by the local catch), and thus won't reach
AtEase::restoreWarnings. This then causes later code to end up
in a mismatching state and creates a confusing error_reporting
state.
See .phpcs.xml, where the at operator is allowed for all test code.
Change-Id: I68d1725d685e0a7586468bc9de6dc29ceea31b8a
This should be the exact same. Its more a style change than anything.
So why do it then?
* I believe this is much less confusing than code mentioning a weird
"standard class". Barely anybody knows what this is, and what the
difference between "object" and "stdClass" is.
* The code is shorter.
* It's even faster. In my micro benchmark it's twice as fast.
Change-Id: I7ee0e8ae6d9264a89b6cd1dd861f0466ae620ccc
These are in preparation for making a TempFSFileFactory service, thus
the odd break-up into two files. I split it into a separate commit so
that we could verify that the same tests pass before and after the
conversion to service.
Tests cover everything except getUsableTempDirectory() (which I don't
see how to test), and register_shutdown_function()-related stuff (which
seems actually impossible to test without starting a new PHP process).
Change-Id: If61b7ea3e332adc2bceefc8e6879a9e9443c99dd
