The anonymous function was equivalent to just specifying 'wfMessage'.
Same as in I355504984d343a2c7c469759f791612c5b6d6556 in Wikibase.
Change-Id: Ib94b7cceabce25ca95374d944255c7197e6a476a
Follows-Up: Ica0740049f0a3e8ec764903c5b71825e4d628a3f
Currently it is documented that mParent in HTMLFormField may be null.
This can happen if the form element is constructed manually via
new, instead of the normal way via HTMLForm methods.
As it stands, much of the code assumes that mParent is always set
despite the documentation. Lets mark creating form fields without
parent set as deprecated. The current situation seems like a
recipe for bugs, and after the deprecation period this would allow
us to simplify some of the HTMLFormField code.
Bug: T326456
Change-Id: Ica0740049f0a3e8ec764903c5b71825e4d628a3f
Depends-On: I15a39605e3eec8a5c265c4a331039fa906eda036
This should be the exact same. Its more a style change than anything.
So why do it then?
* I believe this is much less confusing than code mentioning a weird
"standard class". Barely anybody knows what this is, and what the
difference between "object" and "stdClass" is.
* The code is shorter.
* It's even faster. In my micro benchmark it's twice as fast.
Change-Id: I7ee0e8ae6d9264a89b6cd1dd861f0466ae620ccc
assertEquals( false, … ) still succeeds when the actual value is 0, null,
an empty string, even an empty array. All these should be reported as a
failure, I would argue.
Note this patch previously also touched assertSame( false ). I reverted
these. The only benefit would have been consistency within this codebase,
but there is no strict reason to prefer one over the other. assertFalse()
and assertSame( false ) are functionally identical.
Change-Id: Ic5f1c7d504e7249002d3184520012e03313137b4
This changeset implements T89432 and related tickets and is based on exploration
done at the Prague Hackathon. The goal is to identify tests in MediaWiki core
that can be run without having to install & configure MediaWiki and its dependencies,
and provide a way to execute these tests via the standard phpunit entry point,
allowing for faster development and integration with existing tooling like IDEs.
The initial set of tests that met these criteria were identified using the work Amir did in
I88822667693d9e00ac3d4639c87bc24e5083e5e8. These tests were then moved into a new subdirectory
under phpunit/ and organized into a separate test suite. The environment for this suite
is set up via a PHPUnit bootstrap file without a custom entry point.
You can execute these tests by running:
$ vendor/bin/phpunit -d memory_limit=512M -c tests/phpunit/unit-tests.xml
Bug: T89432
Bug: T87781
Bug: T84948
Change-Id: Iad01033a0548afd4d2a6f2c1ef6fcc9debf72c0d
