Per @Thiemo and @Anomie's comments on the patch, droppping dependency
of the test value to not be a global, using "dummy" in this case.
Bug: T210512
Change-Id: I26aff5fe4782837a8f52a102ae1bdbac49b748bc
This method encourages directly editing configuration variables. It's a
better idea to use setMwGlobals() (or other set wrappers) so that we can
be intelligent in the future, for instance resetting services after the
config change. Plus, a lot of the callers come out cleaner this way
anyway.
Depends-On: I8a1e81acc5c42a8d7f30938a72cface0acea4a70
Depends-On: I4105dbcf9c5399fe7239478c460ec57c015a98d4
Depends-On: I1b220996acf2f66cf7b0f092b341584663df32f9
Depends-On: Ie2d1ea65c0cb334bbde1666d00781474b7ac4dab
Change-Id: I23d77398e401f4986b1d5bd1c9e11a8a40da16f8
The unit tests spend nearly half of their run time resetting the user table for
each test. But the majority of tests do not depend on the user table having the
exact value that the setup code resets it to, and do not need to modify the
user objects they require to run.
Fix that by providing an API for tests to get User objects, and to indicate
whether the User object will be subject to destructive modification or not.
This allows User objects to be reused across multiple unit tests.
Change-Id: I17ef1f519759c5e7796c259282afe730ef722e96
Anything that wants to be "central" right now has to depend on
CentralAuth, and then either can't work without CentralAuth or has to
branch all over the place based on whether CentralAuth is present. Most
of the time all it really needs is a mapping from local users to central
user IDs and back or the ability to query whether the local user is
attached on some other wiki, so let's make an interface for that in
core.
See I52aa0460 for an example implementation (CentralAuth), and Ibd192e29
for an example use (OAuth).
Bug: T111302
Change-Id: I49568358ec35fdfd0b9e53e441adabded5c7b80f