It's the same and makes the test code much more readable, I
would like to argue.
Because of the was I split all the changes I made into smaller
patches this patch contains some other changes in the same
lines where I could not split them off. E.g. removal of
->any(), which is the default anyway and doesn't do anything.
Change-Id: Ib297b989d4aec33b31a4e33fe9d5032865b39be0
Ended up using
grep -Prl '\->setMethods\(' . | xargs sed -r -i 's/setMethods\(/onlyMethods\(/g'
special-casing setMethods( null ) -> onlyMethods( [] )
and then manual fix of failing test (from PS2 onwards).
Bug: T278010
Change-Id: I012dca7ae774bb430c1c44d50991ba0b633353f1
There is native support for all of this now in PHP, thanks to changes
and additions that have been made in later versions. There should be no
need any more to ever use call_user_func() or call_user_func_array().
Reviewing this should be fairly easy: Because this patch touches
exclusivly tests, but no production code, there is no such thing as
"insufficent test coverage". As long as CI goes green, this should be
fine.
Change-Id: Ib9690103687734bb5a85d3dab0e5642a07087bbc
Done with `composer fix` and suppressing the rest (i.e. sniffs for
global variables, which for core should be suppressed anyway).
Additionally, add `-p` to `phpcbf`, as otherwise it just seems stuck.
Change-Id: Ide8d6cdd083655891b6d654e78440fbda81ab2bc
assertEquals( null, … ) still succeeds when the actual value is 0, false,
an empty string, even an empty array. All these should be reported as a
failure, I would argue.
Note this patch previously also touched assertSame( null ). I reverted
these. The only benefit would have been consistency within this codebase,
but there is no strict reason to prefer one over the other. assertNull()
and assertSame( null ) are functionally identical.
Change-Id: I92102e833a8bc6af90b9516826abf111e2b79aac
