Mostly used find-and-replace:
Find:
/\*[\*\s]+@var (I?[A-Z](\w+)(?:Interface)?)[\s\*]+/\s*(private|protected|public) (\$[a-z]\w+;\n)((?=\s*/\*[\*\s]+@var (I?[A-Z](\w+)(?:Interface)?))\n|)
Replace with:
\3 \1 \4
More could be done, but to keep this patch reasonably sized, I only
changed the most obvious and unambiguously correct cases.
In some cases, I also removed redundant doc comments on the
constructor, and re-ordered the properties to match the constructor.
Change-Id: I3f8427ae4f5d55177ae18986ef15d84d0e7bf6f4
I believe this makes the code less brittle, and also makes it a bit
more obvious what these strings are meant to represent.
Change-Id: Ia39b5c80af4b495931d0a68fd091b783645dd709
> We lose useful coverage and waste valuable time on keeping tags
> accurate through refactors (or worse, forget to do so).
>
> Tracking tiny per-method details wastes time in realizing (and
> fixing) when people inevitably don't keep them in sync, and time
> lost in finding uncovered code to write tests to realize it was
> already covered but "not yet claimed".
>
> Given all used methods are de-facto and liberally claimed, and
> that we keep the coverage limited to the subject class, this
> maintains the spirit and intent. PHPUnit offers a more precise
> tool when you need it (i.e. when testing legacy monster classes),
> but for well-written code, the class-wide tag suffices.
Ref https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/q/owner:Krinkle+is:merged+message:Widen
Change-Id: I89f510232554fddeaff90e264e3b396448623888
Just methods where adding "static" to the declaration was enough, I
didn't do anything with providers that used $this.
Initially by search and replace. There were many mistakes which I
found mostly by running the PHPStorm inspection which searches for
$this usage in a static method. Later I used the PHPStorm "make static"
action which avoids the more obvious mistakes.
Bug: T332865
Change-Id: I47ed6692945607dfa5c139d42edbd934fa4f3a36
This allows checking restrictions without a dependency on Title, based
only on a PageIdentity.
Additional fixes along the way:
* Correctly return false instead of 'infinity' for
getRestrictionExpiry( 'create' ) on an existing page
* Correctly handle non-special pages that can't exist (like media pages)
in listApplicableRestrictionTypes() (return empty array instead of
'create')
* Improve readability of isProtected()
The expectation change in TitleTest::testIsProtected() is because the
test was formerly broken, since it set mRestrictions without setting
mRestrictionsLoaded. (Which illustrates how this approach to testing is
essentially broken.)
Co-authored-by: Vedmaka <god.vedmaka@gmail.com>
Bug: T218395
Change-Id: Ia73ea587586cb69eb53265b2f8f7a296a2573dd0
