I don't think these do anything with the documentation generators
we currently use. Especially not in tests. How are tests part of a
"package" when the code is not?
Note how most of these are simply identical to the namespace. They
are most probably auto-generated by some IDEs but don't actually
mean anything.
Change-Id: I771b5f2041a8e3b077865c79cbebddbe028543d1
Just methods where adding "static" to the declaration was enough, I
didn't do anything with providers that used $this.
Initially by search and replace. There were many mistakes which I
found mostly by running the PHPStorm inspection which searches for
$this usage in a static method. Later I used the PHPStorm "make static"
action which avoids the more obvious mistakes.
Bug: T332865
Change-Id: I47ed6692945607dfa5c139d42edbd934fa4f3a36
These are not only 100% identical to the actual code, but also:
* It's error-prone. Some are already wrong.
* These test…() functions are not meant to be called from
anywhere. What is the target audience for this documentation?
* There is a @dataProvider. What such @param tags actually do is
document the provider, but in an odd place. Just looking at
the provider should give the same information.
* The MediaWiki CodeSniffer allows to skip @param when there is
a @dataProvider, for the reasone listed.
Change-Id: I0f6f42f9a15776df944a0da48a50f9d5a2fb6349
Creates an OPTIONS handler that handles any OPTIONS requests that are
not already handled by a handler. CORS has no mechanism to ensure the
user is authenticated, so the Router will reject cross-origin requests
from anon users.
This change allows authenticated users to make cross-origin
requests if they authenticate with OAuth or if
$wgRestAllowCrossOriginCookieAuth is enabled.
Bug: T232176
Bug: T262712
Change-Id: I128b4bdbec4f6bea35142153c951fd7b79617106
