Changes to the use statements done automatically via script
Addition of missing use statement done manually
Change-Id: I4ff4d0c10820dc2a3b8419b4115fadf81a76f7a2
In all these cases the change should be compatible with all existing
callers. Most code still passes an IDatabase to this code. But each
IDatabase is also an IReadableDatabase.
Change-Id: Iae13cd780841b240b7369f6a7f5f38e88064fbd7
* Unnecessary regex modifier. I agree with this inspection which flags
/s modifiers on regexes that don't use a dot.
* Property declared dynamically.
* Unused local variable. But it's acceptable for an unused local
variable to take the return value of a method under test, when it is
being tested for its side-effects. And it's acceptable for an unused
local variable to document unused list expansion elements, or the
nature of array keys in a foreach.
Change-Id: I067b5b45dd1138c00e7269b66d3d1385f202fe7f
Just methods where adding "static" to the declaration was enough, I
didn't do anything with providers that used $this.
Initially by search and replace. There were many mistakes which I
found mostly by running the PHPStorm inspection which searches for
$this usage in a static method. Later I used the PHPStorm "make static"
action which avoids the more obvious mistakes.
Bug: T332865
Change-Id: I47ed6692945607dfa5c139d42edbd934fa4f3a36
createMock() is still relatively new. This code was using more
complicated mock builders before. This was changed just recently.
createMock() is now so short, the extra helper methods don't make
the code more readable, I would argue.
Change-Id: Ia7e24827157d5f49fc7da102418c79ae33c8e053
No integration needed, as long as we don't invoke the real constructor
of ChangesListSpecialPage, which we can avoid by using a mock
Plus a tiny bit of cleanup - don't declare multiple variables at the
same time
Change-Id: Iac9d04e75019d9ea092321481b87756a9bc03055
assertEquals( null, … ) still succeeds when the actual value is 0, false,
an empty string, even an empty array. All these should be reported as a
failure, I would argue.
Note this patch previously also touched assertSame( null ). I reverted
these. The only benefit would have been consistency within this codebase,
but there is no strict reason to prefer one over the other. assertNull()
and assertSame( null ) are functionally identical.
Change-Id: I92102e833a8bc6af90b9516826abf111e2b79aac
This changeset resumes work on T89432 and related tickets
by porting an initial set of tests to the new unit test suite
separated out in I69b92db3e70093570e05cc0a64c7780a278b321a.
The tests were only ported if they worked immediately without
requiring any changes other than changing the test case class
to MediaWikiUnitTestCase and moving the test to the new suite.
If a test failed for any reason (even trivial misconfiguration),
it was NOT ported.
With this change, the unit tests suite now consits of a total
of 455 tests. As before, you can run these tests via the following
command:
$ composer phpunit:unit
Bug: T84948
Bug: T89432
Bug: T87781
Change-Id: Ibb8175981092d7f41864e641cc3c118af70a5c76
This changeset implements T89432 and related tickets and is based on exploration
done at the Prague Hackathon. The goal is to identify tests in MediaWiki core
that can be run without having to install & configure MediaWiki and its dependencies,
and provide a way to execute these tests via the standard phpunit entry point,
allowing for faster development and integration with existing tooling like IDEs.
The initial set of tests that met these criteria were identified using the work Amir did in
I88822667693d9e00ac3d4639c87bc24e5083e5e8. These tests were then moved into a new subdirectory
under phpunit/ and organized into a separate test suite. The environment for this suite
is set up via a PHPUnit bootstrap file without a custom entry point.
You can execute these tests by running:
$ vendor/bin/phpunit -d memory_limit=512M -c tests/phpunit/unit-tests.xml
Bug: T89432
Bug: T87781
Bug: T84948
Change-Id: Iad01033a0548afd4d2a6f2c1ef6fcc9debf72c0d
