* Allow EditPage to create a user on page save. This has to be enabled
in config and then activated by the UI/API caller.
* Add an autocreate source for temporary users.
* Allow editing by anonymous users via automatic account creation when
$wgGroupPermisions['*']['edit'] = false. On an edit GET request, use
an unsaved placeholder user to stand in for post-create permissions.
* On preview or aborted save, the username to be created is stashed in a
session and restored on subsequent requests.
* On a (likely) successful page save, create the account.
* Put regular non-temporary users in a "named" group so that they can be
given additional permissions.
* Use a different "~~~" signature for temporary users
* Show account creation warnings on edit and preview.
Change-Id: I67b23abf73cc371280bfb2b6c43b3ce0e077bfe5
This ensures that assertions work in a uniform way,
and provides meaningful messages in cause of failure.
Change-Id: Ic01715b9a55444d3df6b5d4097e78cb8ac082b3e
Follows-up I361fde0de7f4406bce6ed075ed397effa5be3359.
Per T253461, not mass-changing source code, but the use of the native
error silencing operator (@) is especially useful in tests because:
1. It requires any/all statements to be explicitly marked. The
suppressWarnings/restoreWarnings sections encourage developers to
be "lazy" and thus encapsulate more than needed if there are multiple
ones near each other, which would ignore potentially important
warnings in a test case, which is generally exactly the time when
it is really useful to get warnings etc.
2. It avoids leaking state, for example in LBFactoryTest the
assertFalse call would throw a PHPUnit assertion error (not meant
to be caught by the local catch), and thus won't reach
AtEase::restoreWarnings. This then causes later code to end up
in a mismatching state and creates a confusing error_reporting
state.
See .phpcs.xml, where the at operator is allowed for all test code.
Change-Id: I68d1725d685e0a7586468bc9de6dc29ceea31b8a
It seems some tests are fixed in the meantime without removing the
skipped part for this.
Bug: T195807
Follow-Up: I58261dd70eea3581803987a4a7739c7d55558f42
Change-Id: Ie883b7056cdd0cb6bec81c2f7e4ed54177b4ecb2
Add a new helper to MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase, since deleting pages
seems to be pretty common in tests.
Some calls to WikiPage::factory were also updated to use WikiPageFactory.
Change-Id: I5b5100273a00ac292a1900022ca79708fa254347
PreparedUpdate represents an in-progress edit. It can be used to access
information about the edit from hooks that do to have access to the
PageUpdater. Ideally, the PreparedUpdate or PageUpdater would be passed
to the hook as a parameter. Handlers of legacy hooks may use
WikiPage::prepareUpdate() to access it.
Bug: T242249
Needed-By: I23324a31e06e7e6f28077085c0ade05db63e9a35
Change-Id: Id5ba40a21cc4547205adf2f3a1f725c3a69c24d8
Sometimes we apply tag to a revision even if we
suppress the RecentChange, for example when leaving
redirects after page moves.
Bug: T291967
Change-Id: I7330d3b56cd2280dd23ec0ccb4e1c4807c534739
Some methods in the PageUpdater's class implements the fluent interface
design pattern. Use the fluent interface where need be.
Change-Id: If76a4b8c5070c20ed40038a4ee78e2d677de5180
This ensures that a DerivedPageDataUpdater is initialized earlier during
the edit process, so it can be used by hooks to access the state of the
ongoing edit.
This patch also cleans up PageUpdater a bit to make the internal information
flow more consistent with the idea that PageUpdater is acting as a
builder for a new revision.
Change-Id: I99abb7bdffb2b5ff5979ba5b1e56d39dba4cd3dc
WikiPage is not the right spot to compute all the revert
related stuff - we already figure out manual reverts when
building the EditResult, lets figure out rollbacks and undos
in there as well.
Change-Id: I9fdc5f24c1db1eb0452b90bf4af1ef5ffbce6cb8
See full rationale at I59068cfed10aabf6c6002f9e9312a6ef6e7e9441.
Using IDatabase for now instead of DBConnRef for better BC.
Change-Id: Ie75aaf46ba91779e8706b10efeefa9580857f489
Updates for the removal of the Revision class itself
and the various methods/hooks/variables removed in the
process, including:
- Update some documentation removing most references
to the Revision class and updating the MCR migration
notes to reflect the past tense for Revision methods.
- Change some capitalization from "Revision" to "revision"
to make it clear comments are about revisions in general,
not the Revision class in particular.
- Minor code tweaks including removing unused variables that
were around for the old hooks that were removed, and
removing the use of DeprecatablePropertyArray where no
longer needed for anything.
- Fix incorrect documentation for PageUpdater::getStatus(),
the status value changed a while ago to have revision-record
in addition to revision, and recently to only have the
revision-record, but ironically PageUpdater was never updated.
- Removed Parser::$mRevisionObject, used to be a Revision object
and was deprecated in 1.35, missed earlier because it was no
longer being set to Revision objects, always null.
- Add RevisionRecord typehints in DummyLinker to match those
in the corresponding Linker methods
This should be a no-op in terms of functionality.
Bug: T247143
Change-Id: I03bbb94fc29085855448780b1a5ad9063911ecc4
We can create a BlobStoreFactory with mock services,
the only testing is for the domain of the blob store
being set correctly, which does not require any integration.
Change-Id: I6c4d3f53b3931e3517374ae582208910b56b64f3
The removal of the Revision class led to this test failing, since
tt:1000 started to have content - not sure why but I assume something
in the Revision tests was clearing the store - the text
was "UTContent" which is used in many tests via helper
method MediaWikiIntegrationTestCase::getExistingTestPage()
which can create pages with that text.
Change-Id: I04c669ad8c8a7166138eabc973140205b60536a5
The following methods no longer support Revision parameters:
- CategoryMembershipChange::__construct
- ContentHandler::getUndoContent
- DerivedPageDataUpdater::prepareUpdate
- DifferenceEngine::getRevisionHeader
The following methods were removed entirely:
- Title::countAuthorsBetween
The following methods return arrays that formerly include
a 'revision' key that would emit deprecation warnings when
accessed and return a Revision object. The Revision object
has been removed from the arrays, and the 'revision-record'
key should be used to get the relevant RevisionRecord instead:
- PageUpdater::doModify
- PageUpdater::doCreate
- Parser::statelessFetchTemplate
The ParserOptions `templateCallback` option is a callback
that is called in Parser::fetchTemplateAndTitle() and should
return an array - the 'revision' key to that array used to
be a Revision object and was used if no 'revision-record'
was returned - it is now ignored.
Bug: T247143
Change-Id: I163ada88d649c75697aff4fa31a3a3c0bdef78b7
- EditPage::$mBaseRevision
- EditPage::getBaseRevision()
- Title::getFirstRevision()
- LinksUpdate::setRevision()
- LinksUpdate::getRevision()
- Article::$mRevision
- Article::getRevisionFetched()
- WikiPage::getOldestRevision()
- WikiPage::getRevision()
- ContribsPager::tryToCreateValidRevision()
To make things easier, instead of rewritting
the Revision tests that were using WikiPage::getRevision,
just delete them, its not worth the effort to rewrite
them since the class is going away. For the WikiPage
tests, replace uses of getRevision with getRevisionRecord,
manually converting to a Revision object where needed
Bug: T247143
Change-Id: I52bc1f49649f8bd25797e3f7a090bec9c63ac2d1
This is the default anyway when using ->with(). The test code
becomes so much more readable without this, I would like to
argue. Let it just say "with these values".
Because of the way I split my changes into multiple patches
there are a few other changes in this patch I could not split,
e.g. removing unnecessary ->any(). This is the default anyway
and doesn't make the test more specific.
Change-Id: I34990799fa9258ba8dc64c7e78ec43f7903b7681
It is not entirely meaningless. It might be an indicator that
the number of calls to a method is intentionally unlimited.
This is similar to e.g. an @inheritDoc PHPDoc comment that
marks a method as being "intentionally undocumented".
However, what's the meaning of being "intentionally
unconstrained"? Let's just not have any constraint then.
I feel all these ->expects( $this->any() ) bloat the test
code so much that it's never worth it.
Change-Id: I9925e7706bd03e1666f6eb0b284cb42b0dd3be23
Ended up using
grep -Prl '\->setMethods\(' . | xargs sed -r -i 's/setMethods\(/onlyMethods\(/g'
special-casing setMethods( null ) -> onlyMethods( [] )
and then manual fix of failing test (from PS2 onwards).
Bug: T278010
Change-Id: I012dca7ae774bb430c1c44d50991ba0b633353f1
Code performing edits should not need a full User object, a UserIdentity
should be sufficient.
This is an important step to enabling cross-wiki edits.
Bug: T275509
Change-Id: I357772799e82ea88b1b85b605f76ebefc19ebf21
There is nothing the updates can do,
LinksUpdate also fails if there is no id for the given title on master
Bug: T271356
Change-Id: I7fb690bec8dbfadf71eb9caacb4edbfe6b785e73
This patch touches all uncontroversial (I hope) places where a chain
of isset(), array_key_exist() and the ternary ?: operator can be
replaced with the much shorter ?? feature from PHP 7.
?? does the same. It checks if the element before the ?? is set and
not null. When this check fails, the element after the ?? is used.
Change-Id: Id612e2782ae928164b26b6f0de676c6c7d8302f3
As we convert the RevisionRecord to using Authority,
we no longer need Title instances, so we can convert
that to PageIdentity.
Ideally, we'd part away from using Title at all, but:
1. For foreign wikis PageIdentity has stronger validation,
so calling PageIdentity getId() on Title will break things.
There's still a lot of code depending on lax Title guarantees,
so we keep it.
2. A lot of code still depends on Title, so we try to pass it
through even if we don't nesessarily need to, to save cost
on recreating it later on.
Bug: T271458
Depends-On: I287400b967b467ea18bebbb579e881a785a19158
Change-Id: I63d9807264d7e2295afef51fc9d982447f92fcbd
My personal best practice is to not document @params when there
is a @dataProvider. I mean, these test…() functions are not
meant to be called from anywhere. They do not really need
documentation. @param tags don't do much but duplicate what the
@dataProvider does. This is error-prone, as demonstrated by the
examples in this patch.
This patch also removes @throws tags from tests. A test…() can
never throw an exception. Otherwise the test would fail.
Most of these are found by the not yet released I10559d8.
Change-Id: I3782bca43f875687cd2be972144a7ab6b298454e
