This should be the exact same. Its more a style change than anything.
So why do it then?
* I believe this is much less confusing than code mentioning a weird
"standard class". Barely anybody knows what this is, and what the
difference between "object" and "stdClass" is.
* The code is shorter.
* It's even faster. In my micro benchmark it's twice as fast.
Change-Id: I7ee0e8ae6d9264a89b6cd1dd861f0466ae620ccc
Instead, the constructors for FileJournal and NullFileJournal should be
treated as stable. I would have added @stable, but our linting doesn't
recognize it yet and doesn't let.
Bug: T235066
Change-Id: I7741055b4f00197d1346ebbfebc14f20238a06f3
100% coverage except for one bit of the code that I didn't understand.
Unit tests to come, together with rewrite as a service.
Change-Id: Ib01758d994a9e5587a4fcb5edc3d80010ef05615
