Follows-up I361fde0de7f4406bce6ed075ed397effa5be3359.
Per T253461, not mass-changing source code, but the use of the native
error silencing operator (@) is especially useful in tests because:
1. It requires any/all statements to be explicitly marked. The
suppressWarnings/restoreWarnings sections encourage developers to
be "lazy" and thus encapsulate more than needed if there are multiple
ones near each other, which would ignore potentially important
warnings in a test case, which is generally exactly the time when
it is really useful to get warnings etc.
2. It avoids leaking state, for example in LBFactoryTest the
assertFalse call would throw a PHPUnit assertion error (not meant
to be caught by the local catch), and thus won't reach
AtEase::restoreWarnings. This then causes later code to end up
in a mismatching state and creates a confusing error_reporting
state.
See .phpcs.xml, where the at operator is allowed for all test code.
Change-Id: I68d1725d685e0a7586468bc9de6dc29ceea31b8a
There is a common and reasonable need for longer lines in tests.
The nudge for shorter lines doesn't seem valuable here. The natural
breaks will likely still fall in 80-100 given the enforced practice
for non-test code, e.g. whether through habit, or 80-100 column markers
in text editors, or the finite width of diff and code review
interfaces.
Change-Id: I879479e13551789a67624ce66f0946d2f185e6ee
In looking at early flame graphs and XHGui profiles, I noticed
code paths like `decode -> decode@2 -> decode@3`, for example for
magic words arrays and special page names.
Rather than storing these as `[a, [a, [a, ..], [a, ..], [a, ..], .. ] ]`
store them instead as `[v, [ .. ]]`. This makes for smaller files,
but more important it further reduces runtime overhead.
Bug: T218207
Change-Id: I492e5d32106ba7fd1b22075cf026fee2e3d1944e
