Consensus by 3/4 present members: no CoC defined or in draft, we have searched the wiki, we have asked the board. The best we could find is a dispute procedure.
[19:56] <T_I_M> Justa! vraagje, we hebben gezocht naar de huidige C.O.C maar geen van ons is het gelukt om deze te vinden. Heb jij een link naar de huidige C.O.C?
[19:57] <justa> ja
[19:57] <justa> mom
[20:00] <justa> Er is een dispute procedure
[20:00] <justa> gelinkt vanaf dezelfde plek als de Drew draft
[20:01] <T_I_M> dus verder dan een proposed dispute procedure? is het nooit gekomen? en is dit in jullie ogen een C.O.C maar dan een andere benaming
[20:12] <T_I_M> de documenten (snel) gelezen te hebben, is er nooit een C.O.C geweest, de documenten zijn enkel een dispute procedure, een stap na de C.O.C
[20:19] <justa> ik denk het niet idd
[20:19] <T_I_M> oke dank,
[20:26] <justa> Sowwy
## Analyse why the existing CoC is not widely used, known or adopted
* Interview Drew on what the issues are that he ran into involving the CoC and dispute process (Vote at next meeting)
* Establish outline of CoC Document, in this case I think we should review other CoC's from other orginizations and hackerspaces pick one we all each like and review them all for similarities and useful ideas.
* Editiorial Phase: each member of the committee reviews external information, information from other organizations, and creates drafts they think fit each section or outline for comparison.
* Draft Phase: Group meeting to review edits from the editorial phase, the goal is to vote in a mix of all the edits. This may take multiple meetings per section.
* Techinc Member Draft Phase: Members of Techinc review drafts at any time they please and submit changes or pull requests for review and vote by the CoC Commitee.
* Revision Phase: After majority vote of the CoC Commitee we submit our request for the next ALV to vote in the live CoC Document, we notify everyone of the review and allow extension of the Member Draft Phase until 1 week before the ALV.