Follows-up I4c7d826c7ec654b, I1287f3979aba1bf1.
We lose useful coverage and spend valuable time keeping these accurate
through refactors (or worse, forget to do so). The theoretically "bad"
accidental coverage is almost never actually bad.
Having said that, I'm not removing them wholesale (yet). I've audited
each of these specific files to confirm it is a general test of the
specified subject class, and also kept it limited to those specified
classes. That's imho more than 100% of the benefit for less than 1%
of the cost (more because `@covers` is more valuable than the fragile
and corrosive individual private method tracking in tests that
inevitably get out of date with no local incentive to keep them up to
date).
Cases like structure tests keep `@coversNothing` etc and we still don't
count coverage of other classes. There may be a handful of large
legacy classes where some methods are effectively class-like in
complexity and that's why it's good for PHPUnit to offer the precision
instrument but that doesn't meant we have to use that by-default for
everything.
I think best practice is to write good narrow unit tests, that reflect
how the code should be used in practice. Not to write bad tests and
hide part of its coverage within the same class or even namespace.
Fortunately, that's generally what we do already it's just that we
also kept these annotations still in many cases.
This wastes time to keep methods in sync, time to realize (and fix)
when other people inevitably didn't keep them in sync, time to find
uncovered code only to realize it is already covered, time for a less
experienced engineer to feel obligate to and do write a low quality
test to cover the "missing" branch in an unrealistic way, time wasted
in on-boarding by using such "bad" tests as example for how to use
the code and then having to unlearn it months/years later, loss of
telemetry in knowing what code actually isn't propertly tested due to
being masked by a bad test, and lost oppertunities to find actually
ununused/unreachable code and to think about how to instead structure
the code such that maybe that code can be removed.
------
Especially cases like LBFactoryTest.php were getting out of hand,
and in GlobalIdGeneratorTest.php we even resorted to reminding people
with inline comments to keep tags in sync.
Change-Id: I69b5385868cc6b451e5f2ebec9539694968bf58c
Just methods where adding "static" to the declaration was enough, I
didn't do anything with providers that used $this.
Initially by search and replace. There were many mistakes which I
found mostly by running the PHPStorm inspection which searches for
$this usage in a static method. Later I used the PHPStorm "make static"
action which avoids the more obvious mistakes.
Bug: T332865
Change-Id: I47ed6692945607dfa5c139d42edbd934fa4f3a36
This isn't used anywhere. Theoretical code using would gracefully
fallback to 'md4' given extra params are ignored by PHP.
In terms of future roadmap, I do expect that this algo may have to
change one day based on information that might come to light around
whether MD4 will remain sufficiently fast and/or sufficiently unique.
However, I do not expect that to be so significant in difference that
we'd have to remain some callers on MD4 whilst others adopt something
else. It seems fine that, if that time comes, to simply switch it
and thus consider the algo an implementation detail.
Bug: T32956
Change-Id: Ia9e1366b802ac18f439ce0c802189ede0a2c63f0
Deconstructing non-sparse, numerically indexed arrays directly in
foreach (a.k.a. using the list() syntax in foreach) is possible since
PHP 5.5.
The possibility to use string array keys as well as non-sequential
numeric keys in array deconstruction was added in PHP 7.1.
Change-Id: I56a48552a45f61cedc291b306cad8548fc70d485
This changeset implements T89432 and related tickets and is based on exploration
done at the Prague Hackathon. The goal is to identify tests in MediaWiki core
that can be run without having to install & configure MediaWiki and its dependencies,
and provide a way to execute these tests via the standard phpunit entry point,
allowing for faster development and integration with existing tooling like IDEs.
The initial set of tests that met these criteria were identified using the work Amir did in
I88822667693d9e00ac3d4639c87bc24e5083e5e8. These tests were then moved into a new subdirectory
under phpunit/ and organized into a separate test suite. The environment for this suite
is set up via a PHPUnit bootstrap file without a custom entry point.
You can execute these tests by running:
$ vendor/bin/phpunit -d memory_limit=512M -c tests/phpunit/unit-tests.xml
Bug: T89432
Bug: T87781
Bug: T84948
Change-Id: Iad01033a0548afd4d2a6f2c1ef6fcc9debf72c0d
PHP_CodeCoverage_Exception:
> Trying to @cover not existing method "SwiftFileBackend::sanitzeHdrs".
> Trying to @cover not existing method "LineFormatter::normalizeException".
> Trying to @cover not existing method "MonologSpi::mergeConfig".
> Trying to @cover not existing method "ProcessCacheLRU::het".
> Trying to @cover not existing method "BitmapHandler::swapICCProfile".
> Trying to @cover not existing class or interface "checkParseSafety".
> Trying to @cover not existing method "Article::__call". (was removed).
> Trying to @cover not existing method "ExtensionProcessor::extracttExtensionMessagesFiles".
> Trying to @cover not existing method "FileContentsHasher::getFileContentHash".
Makes code coverage run fail at the moment. These used to be warnings
in PHPUnit 3.x, but are now hard exceptions in PHPUnit 4.x when requesting
a coverage report.
Change-Id: If7f45ca57fd7d480d35b1414a889398837c0c472
The class only contains two dependencies upon MediaWiki (ObjectCache &
wfGlobalCacheKey) which are suitable for inclusion in the utils
directory.
Change-Id: I85b4c763be2670c40f26d93e75cedcb68eaa7987
2015-09-24 18:27:28 -07:00
Renamed from tests/phpunit/includes/FileContentsHasherTest.php (Browse further)
